Stay ahead with the latest cryptocurrency news and analysis
Bitcoin
Blockchain
Asian Markets
Blockchain
Blockchain
Bitcoin
Silver prices tumbled on Wednesday, caught between a hawkish Federal Reserve posture and fresh military escalation in the Middle East, even as a structural supply deficit that has now reached 762 million ounces continues to underpin long-term bullish forecasts.
The white metal fell to $57.87 per ounce on July 15, a drop of 1.35 percent from the prior session, according to one widely cited quote. Other sources put the decline at 1.4 percent to $57.84, or as low as $57.55. Gold, by contrast, held nearly flat at $4,056, pushing the gold-silver ratio to 70-to-1 – a level that underscores just how badly the industrial metal has lagged its yellow counterpart this year.
The latest leg lower followed the United States launching another wave of airstrikes against Iran and reactivating its naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz. The move, which President Trump had signalled the previous day, sent oil prices surging and revived inflation anxieties among investors. For a zero-yielding asset like silver, the combination of rising energy costs and the prospect of tighter monetary policy is doubly punishing.
The inflation picture, however, remains contradictory. US consumer prices fell 0.4 percent month-on-month in June – the first such decline since 2020 – while the annual rate slowed to 3.5 percent from 4.2 percent in May, undershooting expectations of 3.8 percent. Producer prices also dropped 0.3 percent month-on-month, the steepest slide in 14 months. Cheaper oil had been a tailwind, but the Hormuz blockade threatens to reverse that trend.
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh, testifying before Congress, reiterated the central bank’s commitment to price stability but stopped short of signalling a more restrictive stance. Markets nonetheless priced in roughly a 50 percent probability of a rate hike at the September meeting, driven primarily by the geopolitical shock to energy markets. Fed Governor Lisa Cook separately warned of inflation risks stemming from tariffs, the Middle East conflict, and heavy AI-driven investment. The Fed’s Beige Book described economic activity as growing at a slight to moderate pace in eleven of twelve districts, while noting rising input costs tied to the conflict and trade policy – conditions that keep rate-cut hopes at bay.
While short-term macro headwinds dominate price action, the structural picture tells a different story. The Silver Institute projects a sixth consecutive annual supply deficit in 2026, this year of 46.3 million ounces. Since 2021, cumulative shortfalls have reached a staggering 762 million ounces. Mine production is forecast to fall by a further 2.5 million ounces, even as industrial demand – now 58 percent of total consumption – continues to climb.
Solar manufacturers, the largest industrial consumers, have trimmed their silver usage by 19 percent to 151 million ounces this year by substituting copper. Yet the deficit has not narrowed; it continues to widen. Complicating matters further, roughly 70 percent of global silver supply emerges only as a by-product of base-metal mining, leaving producers little ability to ramp up output in response to higher prices.
Inventories on the COMEX have contracted by 75 percent from their 2020 peak, standing at just 79.9 million ounces – a telling sign of physical tightness in a market that has seen paper volumes dwarf available metal.
Despite the near-term rout – silver lost $16.57 per ounce, or 22.04 percent, in the second quarter, its worst quarterly performance since Q1 2020 – major banks remain resolutely bullish. JPMorgan forecasts an average price of $81 per ounce in its base case, with Bank of America eyeing $100 to $133 under a bull scenario. The LBMA consensus sits at $79.57. JPMorgan further sees prices above $80 by year-end and reaching $100 by 2030.
Paul Wong of Sprott notes that while the options market has normalised, physical inventory remains strained, and he expects supply deficits to persist for another seven to eight years, driven by demand from solar, electric vehicles, artificial intelligence, and the military sector.
Technically, support is pegged in the $57 region within a bearish rectangle pattern, with a deeper floor near $55.50 to $56.00. Resistance lies between $59.42 and $59.57. For the weeks ahead, the Strait of Hormuz will remain the critical wildcard – every fresh escalation risks lifting oil prices further, hardening the Fed’s stance, and keeping silver pinned down, even as the market’s fundamental story only grows more compelling.
The silver market has quietly piled up a cumulative supply deficit of 762 million ounces since 2021, yet the metal remains trapped in a tight trading band as conflicting macro forces pull traders in opposite directions. The structural shortage—now in its sixth consecutive year—is deepening even as near-term headwinds from Federal Reserve policy and escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz cap any sustained rally.
Spot silver slipped to around $57.55–$58.00 on Wednesday, giving back a portion of Tuesday’s 2.06% gain that had lifted it to $58.81. The retreat pushed the gold-silver ratio to 70:1, underscoring just how much silver has lagged its yellow counterpart this year. The session’s decline was modest—ranging from 1.4% to 1.9% depending on the pricing source—but it highlighted the market’s sensitivity to competing narratives.
A sharp drop in U.S. consumer prices should have provided unambiguous support. The annual inflation rate came in at 3.5% in June, well below May’s 4.2% reading and missing the 3.8% consensus. On a month-over-month basis, prices actually fell 0.4%—the first monthly decline since 2020. Producer prices also weakened, sliding 0.3% in June, the steepest drop in 14 months.
Lower inflation is typically bullish for silver because the metal carries no yield, making it relatively more attractive when real rates fall. But the Federal Reserve poured cold water on that logic. At his congressional hearing on Tuesday, Fed Governor Kevin Warsh stressed the central bank’s commitment to price stability without hinting at easier policy. Meanwhile, Governor Lisa Cook warned that tariffs, the Middle East conflict, and heavy AI-related investment could reignite inflationary pressures.
The result: markets now see roughly a 50% probability of a rate hike in September—not a cut. That hawkish backdrop is keeping silver bulls on a short leash, even as the inflation data itself looks supportive.
Complicating the outlook is a sharp escalation in the Strait of Hormuz. U.S. President Donald Trump announced a renewed blockade on Iranian shipping and demanded compensation from countries benefiting from American security efforts in the region. Over the weekend, U.S. and Iranian forces exchanged fresh strikes; by Tuesday, the U.S. military had launched additional airstrikes and imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports.
Shipping traffic through the strategic chokepoint has cratered, according to tracking data. Roughly 20% of the world’s oil trade normally passes through Hormuz, so the disruption is already pushing oil prices higher. That adds a second layer of inflation risk that the Fed cannot ignore—and it keeps silver in a volatile tug-of-war between safe-haven demand and the macro drag of higher energy costs.
While day-to-day trading fixates on rate expectations and geopolitics, the structural case for silver has only tightened. The Silver Institute projects a 46.3-million-ounce deficit for 2026, marking the sixth straight year of shortfalls. Mining output is expected to fall by 2.5 million ounces, even as industrial demand—which already accounts for 58% of total consumption—continues to expand on the back of solar, electric vehicles, and artificial intelligence.
Solar manufacturers have notably reduced their silver usage by 19% this year, substituting copper instead. But that thrifting has done little to close the overall gap. Comex inventories have shrunk by 75% from their 2020 peak, standing at just 79.9 million ounces—a clear sign of physical tightening. And with roughly 70% of global silver output produced as a byproduct of copper, lead, and zinc mining, there is little room to ramp up supply quickly.
The second quarter was brutal for silver: it lost $16.57 an ounce, or 22.04%, the worst quarterly performance since the first quarter of 2020. Paul Wong of Sprott attributes the slide to normalisation in the options market, but he stresses that the physical inventory drain leaves the long-term bull case intact. He expects supply deficits to persist for another seven to eight years, driven by demand from solar, EVs, AI, and the military sector.
Major banks share that conviction. JPMorgan sees an average price of $81 in its base case, with a path above $80 by year-end and $100 by 2030. Bank of America’s bull case targets $100–$133. The LBMA consensus stands at $79.57. Technical support is pegged near $57, with a deeper floor between $55.50 and $56.00. Resistance sits around $59.42–$59.57.
For now, silver remains stuck between the Fed’s hawkish posture, the Hormuz shock, and a supply deficit that keeps widening. The interplay between those forces—rather than any single catalyst—will determine whether the metal finally breaks out of its range-bound rut.
Gold’s recent price action tells a story of two opposing forces. On Wednesday, the metal slipped to $4,044.10 per ounce, reversing a sharp rally from the previous session when it had surged more than 2% to close at $4,067.50. The about-face came as escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz pushed crude oil higher, reigniting inflation fears and muddying the outlook for Federal Reserve policy.
Brent crude climbed above $85 a barrel for its third straight winning session after a new wave of US airstrikes against Iran and the reinstatement of a naval blockade near the strategic waterway. The oil rally threatens to undo the relief that gold traders had drawn just a day earlier from softer-than-expected US inflation data. June’s annualized consumer price index came in at 3.5%, down from 4.2% in May and below the 3.8% forecast. Despite that dovish signal, markets still price roughly a 50% probability of a Fed rate hike in September, with rising energy costs now casting doubt on the disinflation narrative.
The net effect has been a grinding weekly loss. Gold is down 1.06% over the past five trading days and sits 28.13% below its January record high of $5,626.80. At the other end, the metal is just 3.66% above its late-October low, a reminder of how quickly sentiment can shift. The relative strength index stands at 40.4, indicating bearish momentum without quite reaching oversold territory.
Yet for all the near-term headwinds, a formidable buyer continues to absorb supply. China’s central bank extended its gold purchasing streak to a 20th consecutive month in June, adding 480,000 fine ounces, or 14.93 tonnes. That represents a 50% surge in monthly buying compared with May – an aggressive accumulation pace at a time when gold was trading near a quarterly trough. Beijing’s strategy remains clear: diversify foreign exchange reserves and reduce dollar dependence, even though gold still accounts for less than 10% of the country’s reserve portfolio.
This is not an isolated phenomenon. Global central bank purchases have now exceeded 1,000 tonnes annually for three straight years, providing a structural floor beneath prices. On the supply side, Metals Focus estimates that total gold supply will expand by only about 3% in 2026, with both mine output and recycling growing modestly. The mismatch between tepid supply growth and insatiable official-sector demand forms a bedrock argument for bulls.
That bullish thesis, however, faces a fresh challenge from one of Wall Street’s most closely watched forecasters. JPMorgan slashed its Q4 2026 gold price target by a quarter, from $6,000 to $4,500 per ounce. The bank cited softer demand from key purchasing segments and growing price sensitivity to real interest rates. An EU embargo on Sudanese gold – a relatively small but symbolic supply-side drag – has further dampened sentiment.
The revision does not represent a wholesale abandonment of the long-term case. JPMorgan retains a structurally bullish view, pointing to central bank buying and physical demand as reliable supports through 2027. But the near-term outlook has clearly darkened. A weak US inflation print could still revive the metal, as lower real rates would reduce the opportunity cost of holding gold. The next big test arrives with the Fed’s upcoming decision: dovish signals could quickly propel prices back toward the $4,200–$4,300 zone.
Not all forecasters are paring back. HSBC, for example, remains more sanguine. The bank sees gold trading in a $3,800–$4,700 range during the second half of 2026, with a year-end target of $4,750 and a further climb to $5,025 by the end of 2027. That view echoes the fundamental story: tight supply, steady central bank accumulation, and the eventual turning of the interest-rate cycle.
Technically, the yellow metal is trading roughly 6.4% below its 50-day moving average of $4,345 – a level that often acts as resistance. The tug-of-war between geopolitical risk premiums and a potentially more restrictive Fed leaves gold trapped in a narrow range. For now, the oil-driven inflation scare appears to have the upper hand, but the persistent presence of central banks in the market suggests the downside may be limited.
The coming days will be shaped by three variables: the trajectory of crude prices as the Hormuz crisis evolves, the next batch of US economic data, and any shift in Fed communication. Until one of those forces decisively breaks the current equilibrium, gold is likely to remain a market of two halves – pulled between the fear of rising rates and the steady hand of official-sector buying.
Gold is locked in a remarkably resilient trading range just above $4,100 an ounce, shrugging off both the biggest Chinese reserve buildup in over two and a half years and fresh geopolitical turmoil in the Middle East. The metal settled at $4,127.60 on Friday, eking out a 0.12% daily decline but logging a weekly loss of 1.43%. Since the start of the year, bullion remains 4.93% in the red.
The tug-of-war between supportive structural demand and mounting headwinds from higher interest rate expectations has kept the precious metal within a tight band. China’s central bank reported its largest monthly increase in gold reserves since early 2022 in June, a stark contrast to India, where elevated price volatility has dragged on demand. Yet even this aggressive buying from Beijing has done little to ignite a rally, underscoring the dominance of monetary policy concerns in the current environment.
Compounding the uncertainty, military clashes between the United States and Iran flared up last week. US forces struck targets inside Iran over two days following attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, and Tehran retaliated against American bases. Gold drew a modest safe-haven bid but quickly gave back gains as surging oil prices reignited inflation fears. The very factors that might normally lift bullion — geopolitical risk and supply disruptions — are simultaneously reinforcing the case for the Federal Reserve to keep rates elevated or even raise them further. Reports that Washington and Tehran are still pursuing peace talks leave the risk premium fragile.
The Fed’s June meeting minutes laid bare a divided committee. Some policymakers argued for steady rates, while others pressed for additional hikes to combat persistent inflation. New York Fed President John Williams pointed to a specific driver of demand-side pressure: the boom in artificial intelligence. Market participants have responded by raising the implied probability of a rate increase at the September meeting to 63%, up from 54% the prior week.
All eyes now turn to Wednesday’s US consumer price index release, the single most important data point for gauging the central bank’s next move. A sticky inflation print would amplify the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding gold and could spur another leg lower. Conversely, a cooling number might give the bulls a temporary reprieve, though the broader rate trajectory remains tilted to the upside.
Technically, the picture reinforces the stagnation. Gold trades 5.45% below its 50-day moving average of $4,365.48 and a steeper 9.07% below the 200-day average of $4,539.11. The relative strength index sits at 44, squarely in neutral territory but leaning toward the weaker side. The 30-day annualized volatility of 27.01% warns that sharp moves in either direction remain likely. On the downside, the $4,000 mark stands as the last line of defense for the bulls, with analysts pointing to organic Asian demand at that level, supported by continued central bank buying. On the upside, a sustained break above $4,150 resistance would be needed to challenge the near-term downtrend.
For now, gold is trapped between two powerful and opposing forces — a structural floor from Chinese and other central bank purchases and a ceiling from rising real yields and hawkish Fed bets. Until CPI data on Wednesday tips the scales one way or the other, the metal is likely to remain in its narrow, uneasy holding pattern.
A Swift pilot project involving 17 major banks briefly propelled XRP upward by 1.6 percent this week, but the rally fizzled almost as quickly as it began. The token’s advance was met with immediate pushback from a former Swift executive, who made clear that the blockchain trial has no direct role for XRP itself.
Swift’s new ledger infrastructure aims to test whether distributed-ledger technology can streamline cross-border payments among institutions including Standard Chartered and UBS — both of which already have existing ties to Ripple through custody services or payment rails on the XRP Ledger. The project focuses on tokenized bank deposits, not the XRP token, according to Tom Zschach, Swift’s former chief innovation officer, who dismissed online speculation about an integration. The tempered assessment underscores a recurring pattern: institutional milestones for Ripple’s technology generate headlines, but they rarely translate into direct demand for the token.
Just days before the Swift announcement, Ripple secured a full MiCA license from Luxembourg’s CSSF, joining a select group of crypto firms authorized to offer services across the European Economic Area. That regulatory breakthrough arrived on the heels of a five-year sponsorship deal with the University of Kansas, placing the XRP logo on Jayhawks jerseys — the first crypto jersey patch in a major NCAA program. The marketing push follows eight consecutive weeks of inflows into XRP ETFs and signals Ripple’s determination to build brand visibility even as the token’s price action remains muted.
XRP changed hands at $1.09 on Friday, a marginal 0.39 percent gain for the day. The weekly performance shows a modest 0.63 percent advance, while the 30-day picture is bleaker at minus 3.89 percent. Year-to-date, the token has slumped 41.75 percent and sits roughly 70 percent below its 52-week high of $3.65 from July 2025. At just 8 percent above the recent yearly low of $1.01, the recovery is fragile.
Spot XRP ETFs recorded net outflows of $7.29 million on July 8, the largest single-day redemption since March 2026, according to SoSoValue. The derivatives market echoes the caution: CoinGlass data shows a long-short ratio of 0.96, meaning bearish wagers now outnumber bullish bets. Open interest has fallen from $2.58 billion to $2.33 billion over the same period, suggesting traders are closing positions rather than opening new ones.
The technical picture reinforces the bearish bias. XRP is trading below the Supertrend indicator on the 4-hour chart and repeatedly fails to break a descending trend line. Resistance sits at $1.094, the 78.6 percent Fibonacci retracement level from the recent selloff, while the 50-day moving average at $1.17 looms further above. The RSI of 44.1 is neutral, and the token is consolidating in a triangle formation between $1.04 and $1.16 on shrinking volume — a stalemate that will eventually resolve.
Ripple’s European licensing, its sports sponsorship, and even the Swift pilot all point to a company that is embedding itself deeper into the financial system. Yet the token itself remains disconnected from those advances. The Swift program relies on tokenized deposits, not XRP, and the Kansas deal is a marketing expense, not a demand driver. With ETF outflows accelerating, derivative positioning turning defensive, and the chart showing no clear breakout catalyst, XRP’s $1.10 resistance looks set to hold until something shifts the balance between genuine institutional progress and market skepticism.