Stay ahead with the latest cryptocurrency news and analysis
Bitcoin
Blockchain
Asian Markets
Blockchain
Blockchain
Bitcoin
Gold’s recent price action tells a story of two opposing forces. On Wednesday, the metal slipped to $4,044.10 per ounce, reversing a sharp rally from the previous session when it had surged more than 2% to close at $4,067.50. The about-face came as escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz pushed crude oil higher, reigniting inflation fears and muddying the outlook for Federal Reserve policy.
Brent crude climbed above $85 a barrel for its third straight winning session after a new wave of US airstrikes against Iran and the reinstatement of a naval blockade near the strategic waterway. The oil rally threatens to undo the relief that gold traders had drawn just a day earlier from softer-than-expected US inflation data. June’s annualized consumer price index came in at 3.5%, down from 4.2% in May and below the 3.8% forecast. Despite that dovish signal, markets still price roughly a 50% probability of a Fed rate hike in September, with rising energy costs now casting doubt on the disinflation narrative.
The net effect has been a grinding weekly loss. Gold is down 1.06% over the past five trading days and sits 28.13% below its January record high of $5,626.80. At the other end, the metal is just 3.66% above its late-October low, a reminder of how quickly sentiment can shift. The relative strength index stands at 40.4, indicating bearish momentum without quite reaching oversold territory.
Yet for all the near-term headwinds, a formidable buyer continues to absorb supply. China’s central bank extended its gold purchasing streak to a 20th consecutive month in June, adding 480,000 fine ounces, or 14.93 tonnes. That represents a 50% surge in monthly buying compared with May – an aggressive accumulation pace at a time when gold was trading near a quarterly trough. Beijing’s strategy remains clear: diversify foreign exchange reserves and reduce dollar dependence, even though gold still accounts for less than 10% of the country’s reserve portfolio.
This is not an isolated phenomenon. Global central bank purchases have now exceeded 1,000 tonnes annually for three straight years, providing a structural floor beneath prices. On the supply side, Metals Focus estimates that total gold supply will expand by only about 3% in 2026, with both mine output and recycling growing modestly. The mismatch between tepid supply growth and insatiable official-sector demand forms a bedrock argument for bulls.
That bullish thesis, however, faces a fresh challenge from one of Wall Street’s most closely watched forecasters. JPMorgan slashed its Q4 2026 gold price target by a quarter, from $6,000 to $4,500 per ounce. The bank cited softer demand from key purchasing segments and growing price sensitivity to real interest rates. An EU embargo on Sudanese gold – a relatively small but symbolic supply-side drag – has further dampened sentiment.
The revision does not represent a wholesale abandonment of the long-term case. JPMorgan retains a structurally bullish view, pointing to central bank buying and physical demand as reliable supports through 2027. But the near-term outlook has clearly darkened. A weak US inflation print could still revive the metal, as lower real rates would reduce the opportunity cost of holding gold. The next big test arrives with the Fed’s upcoming decision: dovish signals could quickly propel prices back toward the $4,200–$4,300 zone.
Not all forecasters are paring back. HSBC, for example, remains more sanguine. The bank sees gold trading in a $3,800–$4,700 range during the second half of 2026, with a year-end target of $4,750 and a further climb to $5,025 by the end of 2027. That view echoes the fundamental story: tight supply, steady central bank accumulation, and the eventual turning of the interest-rate cycle.
Technically, the yellow metal is trading roughly 6.4% below its 50-day moving average of $4,345 – a level that often acts as resistance. The tug-of-war between geopolitical risk premiums and a potentially more restrictive Fed leaves gold trapped in a narrow range. For now, the oil-driven inflation scare appears to have the upper hand, but the persistent presence of central banks in the market suggests the downside may be limited.
The coming days will be shaped by three variables: the trajectory of crude prices as the Hormuz crisis evolves, the next batch of US economic data, and any shift in Fed communication. Until one of those forces decisively breaks the current equilibrium, gold is likely to remain a market of two halves – pulled between the fear of rising rates and the steady hand of official-sector buying.
Gold is locked in a remarkably resilient trading range just above $4,100 an ounce, shrugging off both the biggest Chinese reserve buildup in over two and a half years and fresh geopolitical turmoil in the Middle East. The metal settled at $4,127.60 on Friday, eking out a 0.12% daily decline but logging a weekly loss of 1.43%. Since the start of the year, bullion remains 4.93% in the red.
The tug-of-war between supportive structural demand and mounting headwinds from higher interest rate expectations has kept the precious metal within a tight band. China’s central bank reported its largest monthly increase in gold reserves since early 2022 in June, a stark contrast to India, where elevated price volatility has dragged on demand. Yet even this aggressive buying from Beijing has done little to ignite a rally, underscoring the dominance of monetary policy concerns in the current environment.
Compounding the uncertainty, military clashes between the United States and Iran flared up last week. US forces struck targets inside Iran over two days following attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, and Tehran retaliated against American bases. Gold drew a modest safe-haven bid but quickly gave back gains as surging oil prices reignited inflation fears. The very factors that might normally lift bullion — geopolitical risk and supply disruptions — are simultaneously reinforcing the case for the Federal Reserve to keep rates elevated or even raise them further. Reports that Washington and Tehran are still pursuing peace talks leave the risk premium fragile.
The Fed’s June meeting minutes laid bare a divided committee. Some policymakers argued for steady rates, while others pressed for additional hikes to combat persistent inflation. New York Fed President John Williams pointed to a specific driver of demand-side pressure: the boom in artificial intelligence. Market participants have responded by raising the implied probability of a rate increase at the September meeting to 63%, up from 54% the prior week.
All eyes now turn to Wednesday’s US consumer price index release, the single most important data point for gauging the central bank’s next move. A sticky inflation print would amplify the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding gold and could spur another leg lower. Conversely, a cooling number might give the bulls a temporary reprieve, though the broader rate trajectory remains tilted to the upside.
Technically, the picture reinforces the stagnation. Gold trades 5.45% below its 50-day moving average of $4,365.48 and a steeper 9.07% below the 200-day average of $4,539.11. The relative strength index sits at 44, squarely in neutral territory but leaning toward the weaker side. The 30-day annualized volatility of 27.01% warns that sharp moves in either direction remain likely. On the downside, the $4,000 mark stands as the last line of defense for the bulls, with analysts pointing to organic Asian demand at that level, supported by continued central bank buying. On the upside, a sustained break above $4,150 resistance would be needed to challenge the near-term downtrend.
For now, gold is trapped between two powerful and opposing forces — a structural floor from Chinese and other central bank purchases and a ceiling from rising real yields and hawkish Fed bets. Until CPI data on Wednesday tips the scales one way or the other, the metal is likely to remain in its narrow, uneasy holding pattern.
A Swift pilot project involving 17 major banks briefly propelled XRP upward by 1.6 percent this week, but the rally fizzled almost as quickly as it began. The token’s advance was met with immediate pushback from a former Swift executive, who made clear that the blockchain trial has no direct role for XRP itself.
Swift’s new ledger infrastructure aims to test whether distributed-ledger technology can streamline cross-border payments among institutions including Standard Chartered and UBS — both of which already have existing ties to Ripple through custody services or payment rails on the XRP Ledger. The project focuses on tokenized bank deposits, not the XRP token, according to Tom Zschach, Swift’s former chief innovation officer, who dismissed online speculation about an integration. The tempered assessment underscores a recurring pattern: institutional milestones for Ripple’s technology generate headlines, but they rarely translate into direct demand for the token.
Just days before the Swift announcement, Ripple secured a full MiCA license from Luxembourg’s CSSF, joining a select group of crypto firms authorized to offer services across the European Economic Area. That regulatory breakthrough arrived on the heels of a five-year sponsorship deal with the University of Kansas, placing the XRP logo on Jayhawks jerseys — the first crypto jersey patch in a major NCAA program. The marketing push follows eight consecutive weeks of inflows into XRP ETFs and signals Ripple’s determination to build brand visibility even as the token’s price action remains muted.
XRP changed hands at $1.09 on Friday, a marginal 0.39 percent gain for the day. The weekly performance shows a modest 0.63 percent advance, while the 30-day picture is bleaker at minus 3.89 percent. Year-to-date, the token has slumped 41.75 percent and sits roughly 70 percent below its 52-week high of $3.65 from July 2025. At just 8 percent above the recent yearly low of $1.01, the recovery is fragile.
Spot XRP ETFs recorded net outflows of $7.29 million on July 8, the largest single-day redemption since March 2026, according to SoSoValue. The derivatives market echoes the caution: CoinGlass data shows a long-short ratio of 0.96, meaning bearish wagers now outnumber bullish bets. Open interest has fallen from $2.58 billion to $2.33 billion over the same period, suggesting traders are closing positions rather than opening new ones.
The technical picture reinforces the bearish bias. XRP is trading below the Supertrend indicator on the 4-hour chart and repeatedly fails to break a descending trend line. Resistance sits at $1.094, the 78.6 percent Fibonacci retracement level from the recent selloff, while the 50-day moving average at $1.17 looms further above. The RSI of 44.1 is neutral, and the token is consolidating in a triangle formation between $1.04 and $1.16 on shrinking volume — a stalemate that will eventually resolve.
Ripple’s European licensing, its sports sponsorship, and even the Swift pilot all point to a company that is embedding itself deeper into the financial system. Yet the token itself remains disconnected from those advances. The Swift program relies on tokenized deposits, not XRP, and the Kansas deal is a marketing expense, not a demand driver. With ETF outflows accelerating, derivative positioning turning defensive, and the chart showing no clear breakout catalyst, XRP’s $1.10 resistance looks set to hold until something shifts the balance between genuine institutional progress and market skepticism.
Silver has endured a turbulent stretch, lurching from a sharp selloff triggered by the collapse of the US–Iran provisional peace agreement to a rapid recovery fueled by fresh Middle Eastern hostilities and a weakening dollar. The white metal, which briefly touched a weekly low of $55.75, has clawed back to trade near $59 per ounce, with institutional investors positioning for a longer-term rebound even as short-term headwinds persist.
The catalyst for the initial leg lower came on Wednesday when President Donald Trump declared the tentative peace deal with Iran dead. Crude oil prices surged more than 5% on the news, stoking inflation fears and reinforcing expectations that the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates elevated. Markets now assign a 66% probability to a US rate hike in September, a scenario that typically pressures zero-yielding assets like silver. Against that backdrop, the metal slumped to $58.38 before extending its decline.
Yet even as prices faltered, a contrarian trend emerged in the ETF arena. The iShares Silver Trust recorded net inflows of over $14 million last week, with holdings expanding by roughly four tonnes. The buying is in stark contrast to gold, where the world’s largest gold ETF, SPDR Gold Shares, shed nearly $1 billion over the same period. Year-to-date, silver ETFs have suffered net outflows of around $3.6 billion, representing a 9% contraction in total holdings, suggesting that the recent inflows represent selective accumulation rather than a broad reversal.
The geopolitical landscape shifted again on Thursday, sending silver sharply higher. American strikes against Iran prompted retaliatory rocket attacks on Kuwait and Bahrain, driving investors into safe havens. The rebound accelerated as the US dollar softened, making dollar-denominated silver more attractive to overseas buyers. The metal surged as much as 3.5% in a single session, bringing the psychologically important $60 level back into sight. President Trump later calmed markets by stating that Iran was seeking a deal, but the damage to sentiment had already been done.
The gold-to-silver ratio, a key barometer for relative value, stood at 69.44 – meaning an ounce of gold buys nearly 69.5 ounces of silver. The ratio has edged lower from recent highs, signaling that silver is starting to outperform its yellow counterpart.
Technically, silver has bounced hard from its June low near $54, but analysts remain cautious. Many chart watchers describe the current pattern as a bear flag, warning that a sharp rally could be a prelude to further downside. Nevertheless, a sustained break above nearby resistance would open the door to a move toward $73 in the medium term, according to some technical strategists.
Major banks are looking well beyond the current noise. J.P. Morgan forecasts an average silver price of $81 per ounce for the current year – roughly double the average of 2024. Longer-term, a handful of analysts see the metal reaching $100 by 2030, underpinned by industrial demand and structural supply deficits.
For now, the trajectory hinges on the Federal Reserve. The release of the Fed minutes on Wednesday will be scrutinized for any shift in the rate outlook. Should policymakers signal that cuts are on the horizon, the current rally would gain significant momentum. If, however, the hawkish tone persists, silver’s recovery may prove short-lived. The competing forces of geopolitical risk, dollar direction, and monetary policy are keeping the white metal firmly in the spotlight.
Gold came under renewed selling pressure on Thursday after the release of Federal Reserve meeting minutes revealed a more aggressive policy stance than markets had anticipated. The precious metal slipped to $4,043.60 per troy ounce, extending its seven-day decline to 2.25% and leaving it 6.87% in the red since the start of the year. At its current level, the spot price sits roughly 28% below the 52-week high of $5,626.80 reached in January.
The catalyst for the latest leg lower was the publication of the Fed’s latest deliberations, which showed committee members discussing further tightening amid stubbornly high inflation. Chair Kevin Warsh remains steadfast in his commitment to the 2% target, and several policymakers signaled readiness to keep rates elevated for an extended period. Traders have now priced in a strong probability of a rate increase at the September meeting, with some even speculating about a move as early as July. The prospect of higher borrowing costs has crushed any lingering hope of near-term cuts that had buoyed gold earlier in the year, raising the opportunity cost of holding the non-yielding asset.
Underpinning the Fed’s hawkish tilt is a surge in energy-driven inflation. US consumer prices climbed to 4.2% in June — the highest reading in three years — fueled by the continued blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The disruption, which began in late February, has kept oil and gas prices elevated, creating a vicious cycle: geopolitical turmoil normally drives investors into gold as a safe haven, but this time the resulting inflation has forced central banks to tighten policy, undermining the metal’s appeal.
The dollar’s strength has added another layer of headwinds. A firm greenback makes dollar-denominated gold more expensive for international buyers, compounding the drag from rising real yields. Volatility remains extreme, with gold accounting for 42% of total trading volume at broker Capital.com in the second quarter.
Yet the selling has not been universal. While ETF investors have continued to exit — 16 tonnes flowed out of physically backed funds in May, and redemptions persisted into June — sovereign buyers have taken advantage of lower prices. Central banks added a net 244 tonnes of gold in the first quarter, led by Poland, Kazakhstan and Brazil, a trend that has provided a floor under the market. Still, some 298 tonnes of ETF holdings are now sitting below the $4,000 level, creating a dense zone of technical resistance that any rally must first overcome.
Chart watchers are increasingly bearish. The 50-day moving average has crossed below the 200-day moving average — a classic “death cross” pattern — and the price currently stands 7.78% below the short-term trend line and 10.91% below the long-term one. The relative strength index at 38.4 suggests oversold conditions, but 30-day volatility of nearly 28% points to lingering nervousness. The next major support sits just 3.65% below current levels at $3,901.30, the 52-week trough; a decisive break below that could open the path toward $3,500.
Among the big banks, forecasts remain divided. JPMorgan sees gold recovering to $4,500 by the fourth quarter, while Goldman Sachs recently trimmed its year-end estimate to $4,900. Analysts broadly agree that a durable turnaround hinges on one condition: a de-escalation of the Iran standoff that would relieve pressure on energy prices and, in turn, allow the Fed to ease off its restrictive stance. Until then, the metal looks likely to remain caught between cautious central bank buying and the gravitational pull of higher yields and a stronger dollar.