Stay ahead with the latest cryptocurrency news and analysis
Blockchain
Blockchain
Blockchain
Blockchain
Blockchain
Asian Markets
In a groundbreaking announcement, Anthonyptic has introduced Claude Sonnet 4.5, which is the most advanced coding model in the world so far. This most recent version, to be released on September 30, 2025, will be able to change the way developers write software, solve complex reasoning problems, and deploy intelligent agents.
With AI invading every nook and cranny of the tech sector, Claude Sonnet 4.5 found itself at the right place at the right time, as the need for dependable, robust tools in the software development industry has never been greater. As the coding efficiency, mathematical abilities and task processing are improved, the model creates a new standard of what AI can accomplish in real-world, practical settings.
The release is timed with an AI-based productivity tools boom, with businesses competing to automate repetitive tasks from employees and accelerate the development process. Anthropic, a company that prioritises creating safe and interpretable AI systems, highlights the fact that Claude Sonnet 4.5 does not only run faster or wiser: it is set to take on the complexity of creating software in modern times with a degree of autonomy that is on the edge of revolutionary.
First movers and observers of the industry are already hyping how it could bring advanced programming to a democratic process, allowing elite-level code to be available to a wider audience of professionals.
The core component of Claude Sonnet 4.5 consists of a set of functionalities specifically designed to help developers cope with the challenges of the modern software environment. The major improvement is the introduction of the enhanced Claude Code interface, which now has smart checkpoints.
They enable users to save progress when the task is incomplete and be able to easily move back to past states, even when in an iterative development process. The model, combined with an updated terminal interface, provides a more user-friendly setting in which commands and real-time debugging can be performed.
To people who are already using AI as a part of their workflows through APIs, Anthropic has brought about context editing, which allows dynamic updates to conversation history without losing the thread.
An additional memory tool also gives the model the ability to store long sessions, thus it is the best match to support building complex agents that recall user preferences and project history through multiple interactions. This is especially disruptive with reference to enterprise applications, in which AI-assisted workflows can be used to save hours in the development timelines due to continuity.
The conversational platform, Claude Apps, has also been modified to allow the execution of direct code and the generation of files in a chat. Spreadsheets, presentation slides, or even complete documents can now be created on the fly by the developers, and it is difficult to distinguish between ideation and implementation.
The introduction of Claude for Chrome extension, which was previously in limited beta, is a major move towards integrating AI into browsers so that workflows that are web-based can be easily accessed.
Completing the toolkit is the Claude Agent SDK, which is a developer-friendly framework allowing access to the same underlying infrastructure behind Claude Code. This SDK allows developers to create specialised AI agents to do specialised tasks, such as automated testing or automating code reviews.
The only thing that makes Claude Sonnet 4.5 so high is its performance dominance in terms of rigorous performance metrics. The model scores the highest on the SWE-bench Verified benchmark, the gold standard of AI evaluation of problem-solving in real-world software engineering problems.
It also completes an eye-opening 61.4% on OSWorld, a tough test of computer interaction tasks trying to replicate human-like computer interaction and manipulation in digital worlds.
High-level code improvement, in addition to code, is reflected in reasoning and domain knowledge. The model performs well in finance, law, medicine and STEM, where mathematical calculations and logical inferences are key.
To give an example, it can break down complicated algorithms or model financial processes with less error than its predecessors, due to tuned training on large and high-quality datasets. These benefits are a result of the iterative nature of work by Anthropic, which involves a combination of huge computational power and human intervention in order to make results creative in addition to being accurate.
In reality, this will reflect itself in concrete productivity improvement. Software developers in a mid-sized firm who tested the model claimed that it was able to reduce debugging time on migration of legacy code by 40 per cent, and independent developers have praised that it is capable of generating boilerplate code that follows best practices without requiring much prodding. With remote and distributed teams becoming the new normal, a tool such as Claude Sonnet 4.5 may help people to close the knowledge gap, allowing junior engineers to punch above their weight.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 does not merely compete in the hyper-competitive AI industry–it dominates. General-purpose intelligence has been advanced by other competitor systems, such as the GPT series of OpenAI and the Gemini system by Google, but Anthropic has an advantage due to its emphasis on coding specificity.
Compared to larger models that tend to need heavy fine-tuning to complete dev work, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is designed to provide cleaner code that requires fewer executable lines out of the box. Its ability to build agents is more dynamic than the competition in multi-step work processes, and it is important to retain context in a long-term perspective.
Critics point out that benchmark win is a convincing factor, but it will have to be adopted in the real sense based on ease of integration and cost effectiveness. However, by focusing on safety, the model can be used in regulated industries that fear uncontrolled AI usage since it operates in the stricter Anthropic AI Safety Level 3 guidelines.
Proactively, classifiers within the system block dangerous applications, e.g. those that involve chemical or biological threats, with increased accuracy and one that minimises false alarms.
In line with the spirit of broad access of Anthropic, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is launched on all major platforms, the Claude apps, API endpoints, Claude Code environment and developer console.
It is priced similarly to its predecessor, Claude Sonnet 4, and thus, there are no obstacles to those who already have the previous version to upgrade. This price-effectiveness–together with adjustable levels to companies of any size makes it a feasible alternative to more expensive proprietary systems.
To make it all interesting, Anthropic is also previewing a five-day research titled Imagine with Claude, which is available exclusively to premium subscribers. This mode of experimentation allows the normalisation of software prototypes in real-time with no existing code libraries to promote pure creative exploration by the AI. It is a preview of AI in the future, where models will share the authorship of entire applications based on high-level specifications.
The release of Claude Sonnet 4.5 is reverberating beyond code editors. In a world where software forms the foundation of all things, such as autonomous cars and targeted medicine, a more powerful coding AI would speed up innovation in every industry.
Startups may develop MVPs in a few days, as opposed to weeks; big techs work on massive codebases to make them efficient and secure. It furthermore creates concerns regarding job displacement, though–will AI coders replace human ones, or enhance them into human supercharged partners?
Anthropic safety-first ethos is a reassuring one, ethically speaking. The company focuses on transparency and harm reduction, which is why the tendency to raise questions about the misuse of AI can affect the industry standards. Models such as this would be examples of responsible development as regulators across the world examine generative tools.
In perspective, Claude Sonnet 4.5 does not end but is a starter. As it continues to release even more ambitious pieces in the future, with whispers of even more ambitious releases, Anthropic is establishing itself as a leader in reliable AI.
To the developers, it is a call to arms: use this power to create the future, line of code by line. With September 30, 2025, slipping behind us, one thing, at least, comes out clearly, namely, that this model is not simply writing code, but it is rewriting the laws of creation.
In an eye-catching geopolitical twist that caused shock to Silicon Valley and beyond, President Donald Trump declared a $11th hour deal with China on September 26, 2025, to avert the looming ban on TikTok in the United States.
The agreement, the result of intense virtual negotiations between White House officials and Chinese representatives, requires the greater localisation of data and American control over the work of the algorithms of the application itself, which in fact rescues the 170 million American users of the platform.
The resolution is a rare win in U.S.-China tech diplomacy, but it raises new concerns regarding national security, content moderation, and the future of short-form video in a divided online world, just days before a court-imposed shutdown deadline.
The news, given through a midday tweet by Trump himself, was that Tik Tok would remain but in our terms! Great Deal with China–America First! started a maniacal response. Stocks of the parent company of TikTok, ByteDance, increased by 15 per cent in Hong Kong, whereas U.S. social media shares declined as an additional competitor entered the market.
Relief to creators and businesses that depend on the viral engine of the app, the news is a respite; a temporary reprieve with overtures of concealed danger to privacy advocates. With the dust yet settling on this Friday, the tech world tries to come to terms with what a tradeoff between economic pragmatism and long-term suspicions may portend.
What has followed since the disruptive rise in 2018 are some ups and downs in the American journey of TikTok as the subject of scrutiny by the regulators. The Douyin application, developed by ByteDance in China, soon attracted the attention of Gen Z through its addictive dances, memes, and e-commerce features, reaching more than a billion users worldwide.
However, its Chinese connection sounded alarms in Washington, where legislators lamented the possibility of spying through harvesting user information. In 2020 and 2024, bills were passed through Congress, and Trump signed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, which provided a divestiture deadline of January 2025, or a nationwide blackout would happen.
As of mid-September 2025, the clock was ticking more. The federal courts denied the cases filed by ByteDance, citing the evidence of national security due to leaked intelligence reports claiming that data flows to Chinese servers. Purchasers Oracle and Walmart also pulled out under antitrust obstacles, and the future of the app remains uncertain.
Producers organised movements of protests under the hashtag # SaveTikTok and flooded Capitol Hill to demand action on how lost revenues were affecting their livelihoods – some influencers claimed 6-figure incomes were under threat. Meanwhile, other competitors such as Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts increased their poaching, draining dollars in ad revenue and algorithms optimised to recreate the magic of TikTok For You Page.
Open the eleventh-hour diplomacy. According to sources near the negotiations, the Trump team, using the semiconductor and EV trade negotiations, demanded that China give in. Still hurt by export restrictions on rare earths, Beijing responded with threats of transparency.
The outcome of this negotiation is referred to as the TikTok Accord and stipulates that ByteDance must ring-fence the user data of U.S. residents in Oracle-controlled data centres, which the Federal Trade Commission and independent cybersecurity auditors will audit on an annual basis.
Algorithms that are coded as long and have been labelled by critics as the pro-China code would now pass through the scrutiny of a bipartisan congressional panel after every quarter, and such alterations could be vetoed by the congressional panel in its entreaty to pro-China propaganda.
Fundamentally, the treatise is a master of stratification of defence. The profiles, videos and interactions of U.S. users will no longer cross the Chinese borders; instead, they will be redirected to secure servers in Virginia and Texas. ByteDance invests $2 billion in AI compliance technology in America, including watermarking to identify deepfakes and audits of recommendation engine bias.
Also, in reference to content warriors, the deal requires human moderators (50% of whom are U.S.-hired) for misinformation removals, focusing on election interference and spikes in hate speech that afflicted the 2024 cycle.
But strings abound. Failure to comply initiates automatic geoblocking that is accompanied by fines reaching 10 per cent of global revenue. In return, China allows the sale of some U.S. apps in its market, such as Threads by Meta, which critics call a tech-for-data swap.
It was heralded by Trump as the art of the deal reborn and was attributed to his personal relationship with Xi Jinping. But sceptics such as the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Mark Warren, threaten lapses in enforcement: ‘Audits are just as good as the eyes of the auditors–and Beijing has a track record of smoke and mirrors.’
The technological aspect is also a prickly one. The competitive advantage of TikTok is its homegrown AI that is trained on petabytes of swipe information to achieve a virality prediction with spooky accuracy. Delivery of glimpses of that black box might result in copycats or, even worse, reverse-engineering by competitors.
Privacy advocates such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation lament that the deal did not provide user opt-outs, stating that it causes the concept of privacy to become institutionalised as surveillance capitalism in disguise.
There are shockwaves of the Accord that go well beyond the U.S. In Europe, where TikTok is under investigation under the Digital Services Act, regulators are considering such agreements- India, which banned the application in 2020, may even change its mind.
The eSafety Commissioner of Australia described the action as a blueprint to have balanced borders, whereas Brazil considered the introduction of tariffs on Chinese technological imports as a retaliatory measure towards alleged favouritism.
In the case of ByteDance, it is a lifeline of latitude. In an internal communication, CEO Shou Zi Chew pledged to work even harder on building trust, as he declared an increase in content and engineering jobs by 10,000 in the U.S.
However, there are rumours in Shanghai that internal forces at work: the concessions are seen by some hardliners as a surrender, which could offer encouragement to domestic competitors such as Kuaishou. With creators returning in large numbers, Wall Street analysts expect TikTok to recover to $15 billion by 2026 through its U.S. ad revenue.
TikTok has its heartbeat in the creator economy, which will flourish once again. 60% of the youth demographic on the platform could afford to relax, and by evening, the viral challenges were back on.
Brands such as Nike and Chipotle, which froze campaigns in uncertain times, reallocated budgets with a focus on tie-ins during the holidays. Nevertheless, the spectre of volatility remains–data retroactivity was a concern to users; they needed to know what was uploaded before.
The point here is a growing fault in the worldwide technology: the tension between the borderless movement of innovation and the sturdy grip of sovereignty. The deal made by Trump resembles previous salvos, such as the Huawei truce in 2019 and the WeChat carve-outs.
It is undeniable that economic interdependence can override open bans. The moral of the story, to Big Tech, is to diversify or perish. The new Zuckerberg at Meta, who has just got off with antitrust lawsuits, is said to have lobbied to lift the ban to sustain competitive mayhem.
Scholars predict the spillover of AI regulation. Will OpenAI or Anthropic do the same, should the algorithms at TikTok be subjected to scrutiny by the U.S.? The Accord also has a provision of emergent tech alignment, which can accelerate bilateral standards of generative models.
Climate technology observers see similarities: in the same way that rare earth transactions have eased the U.S.-China relationship, so may information diplomacy. Left critics, such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, viciously attacked the deal as corporate welfare to spies and insisted on worker protections for ByteDance gig moderators. Right-wingers such as Sen.
Tom Cotton termed it as appeasement 2.0, promising to hold oversight hearings. Bipartisan discomfort unites around the issue of youth safety: Addictive features of TikTok are linked to increasing levels of adolescent anxiety, according to CDC statistics, and age-gated features have been requested.
Reactions separate the scroll in TikTok. The most followed creator, Charli D’Amelio, who has 150 million fans, posted a duet with the save: Back to business–let’s make magic! The app was proclaimed as a digital democracy saved by smaller voices, such as educators in the countryside, who made use of the app to teach.
Tech insiders were additionally more reserved. An anonymous former ByteDance engineer disclosed the scramble: “An engineer at the company said, speaking anonymously, that they rewired overnight, by dawn, U.S. servers hummed, and the true test of it all was cultural fit.
Analysts such as Wedbush Dan Ives perceive some silver in this: “This stabilises the ad duopoly, which releases capital to do moonshots. But Wedbush peers think they are overstepping the mark: “One slip and it’s ban again. Mod ideas that include the idea of networked data pods through blockchain, perhaps, are being discussed on forums to secure against flipping to fiat in the future.
With September 26 in the rearview mirror, the TikTok Accord is a wilting ray of hope in the Technological Conflict between the U.S. and China. Hurdles to implementation–Q1 2026 first audits, pilot test on election content. The triumph of the walled gardens might become normalised by global apps, which encourage hybrid modes where the code is cosmopolitan and the data is home.
Failure? The internet is being broken back into ideological silos. Swipe on, swipe algorithms, and swipe diplomats. The truce in the world theatre of tech titans is called to today to remind us: we can ban things easily, but we cannot make deals like the boldest. It lives or falls apart, but either way, this accord remakes the principles of digital interaction in the case of viral videos.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has been issuing an emergency directive that requires all federal agencies to take immediate action in response to the rising cyber threats to critical infrastructure. On September 25, 2025, CISA issued Emergency Directive 25-03, which directs the agencies of the U.S.
Federal Civilian Executive Branch to detect, evaluate and remove risks of a possible breach of Cisco networking equipment. The order is issued against the backdrop of active exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities in Cisco firewalls and operating systems that are widely used, and hackers are already in government networks.
The vulnerability of the legacy hardware in the face of advanced attacks is already too old of a problem that a rush across federal IT departments to spot and protect their environment before the end of the night before midnight.
There could not be a better time than now. The patches are needed by noon Eastern Daylight Time on September 26, and the agencies are scrambling to provide protection to systems that support it all, businesses, and government-wide communication of national defence to information sharing in health.
With the sun coming up on this critical Friday, cybersecurity analysts are also sounding the alarm that the ripple effect may spread way above Washington, with a possible vulnerability of the private sector networks to the same risks.
These proper intrusions can be linked to a secret hacking program that has gone unnoticed for almost two years. Security researchers dubbed it ArcaneDoor, and the attack started to emerge in November of 2023, with the first signs of compromise being discovered on Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) devices.
What began as a small number of defects has now escalated into a full-scale attack with hackers using unknown vulnerabilities to carve through the core of networks. The two vulnerabilities, CVE-2025-20333 and CVE-2025-20362, have a high severity level and are at the core of the breach.
The former enables unauthorised distant attackers to execute arbitrary code on susceptible devices, in effect forfeiting administrative control without even a password request. The second opens a backdoor to limited areas of management that allows intruders to probe sensitive settings without being spotted.
The vulnerabilities mainly focus on Cisco ASA and Firepower Threat Defence (FTD) software, especially on 5500-X Series firewalls, in which VPN web services are configured, a widely used configuration in government configurations to allow remote access security.
However, the danger is not limited to this. Similar attacks have struck Cisco IOS and IOS XE operating systems, which are the backbone of routers and switches running large portions of the internet.
The Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) implementation vulnerability CVE-2025-20352 is a zero-day vulnerability that allows low-privileged users to cause denial-of-service crashes or elevate their privileges to root-level, enabling remote code execution.
Cisco has estimated that as many as two million devices in the entire world may be vulnerable, and many thousands of them may be in enterprise and government fleets. Attackers have been seen to combine these bugs in succession to install enduring malware, overwritten device software to endure reboots and software updates.
It is the chilling sophistication. After access, hackers use specialised programs such as a Line Dancer, and in-memory shellcode loaders, which allow them to bypass antivirus scans, and Line Runner, a low-profile backdoor to command interception. They turn off logging in order to hide tracks, impersonate legitimate traffic to blend in with it, and even crash equipment in strategic places, so that forensic evidence can be cleared.
It is not an opportunistic crime, but a planned spy game, due to the UAT4356 threat group – or STORM-1849, according to Microsoft experts – which is largely suspected to be a state-sponsored aggressor that has intentions towards U.S. intelligence.
ArcaneDoor is not a flash in the pan. It dates back to mid-2023, when the ecosystem of Cisco was targeted by exploit developers. Towards the end of last year, the campaign had recorded victories of high-profile targets, including the defence contractors and operators in the energy sector.
The revelations of this week were a sharp uphill point, as there have been established breaches in various federal agencies. An official of CISA, who was addressing the matter on anonymity, said that the intrusions are a major threat to the networks of the victims, and their evasion techniques have stretched the time of detection up to months.
The campaign characteristics are screamer advanced persistent threat (APT). Intruders prefer techniques that are instituted on the land, which involve repurposing built-in Cisco tools to steal the data instead of using a noisy payload.
In one reported case, hackers stole CLI commands to intercept administrator sessions and harvest credentials, enabling them to move laterally across segmented networks. Alternatively, it may compromise the read-only memory (ROM) by inserting hardware-level backdoors to make the standard patching procedure useless unless the device has been wiped.
Security organisations monitoring the group mention the overlaps with the previous activities, such as the use of CVE-2024-20353 and CVE-2024-20359 as part of the previous Cisco IOS bugs. It is a trend of a focused group that is refining its art against the American technology powerhouses, which may be a prelude to wider disruptive actions.
According to one of the researchers in a briefing during one of the late nights, this was the digital version of the bugs planted in the Oval Office, without any noise, long-term benefit, and silent.
The directive of CISA cuts through the bureaucracy like a razor blade. Released as a part of the Federal Information Security Modernisation Act, ED 25-03 commits all FCEB agencies to a zero-tolerance schedule.
By midday EDT today, September 26, all the Department of Homeland Security and the Environmental Protection Agency outfits will be required to comb their inventories of the affected Cisco equipment. This includes the use of CISA forensic toolkit a set of scripts and indicators of compromise (IOCs) to search evidence of suspicious activity such as suspicious SNMP queries or maliciously altered firmware hashes.
In the case of compromised devices, the rule is very clear: disconnect now and put them in a sandbox to study them. The uncompromised units are provided with a grace period to implement Cisco’s newly released patches, but that is only until the deadline. Agencies that cannot upgrade should explain why they need more time, but CISA has expressed limited sympathy.
To make the situation more urgent, all ASA devices that reached end-of-support have to be decommissioned by September 30, no exceptions. The instruction is straightforward: “Legacy platforms are not able to withstand modern dangers, and this should not be surprising given decades of warnings about unupgraded hardware.
Best reporting is a top-down process. The agencies provide weekly reporting via the CISA secure portal, including scans and patches, and exfiltrated data. Failure to comply may also lead to defunding or congressional oversight, which would serve as a deterrent as much as shared threat intelligence serves as a carrot. Already, virtual interagency task forces are being established, which are sharing resources to triage the most vulnerable assets in sectors such as transportation and healthcare.
On its part, Cisco acted fast. The company implemented fixes to its product lines on September 24 and asked customers to switch on multi-factor authentication on management interfaces and segment VPN traffic. These vulnerabilities are dangerous, the security advisory from Cisco suggests, and it recommends conducting vulnerability scans and firmware integrity checks as soon as possible.
Intrusion prevention systems have also been open-sourced with detection signatures by the vendor to defenders, who can now use proactive filters. The playbook follows the CISA model in other organizations not under the umbrella of the federal: Inventory all Cisco appliances, focus on high-risk exposures such as internet-facing firewalls, and test the patches in staging systems to prevent outages.
The experts promote the use of defences in layers, including zero-trust architectures, behavioural analytics, and frequent red-team exercises, in order to soften the zero-day edge. Patching is table stakes, says an experienced network engineer. And the actual victory is the act of presuming breach and constructing strength in the wake of it.
The Cisco story is heard all over the world. With millions of gadgets in play, commercial players in finance, utilities and telecommunications are shaking off playbooks, dreading collateral damage.
According to the stock watchers, the shares of Cisco declined last night, but the company did not pay much attention to systemic risks. Allies such as the National Cyber Security Centre in the UK, which was also responding to the request by CISA, put out similar alerts to NATO allies.
The case intensifies an irritating reality: supply chain bottlenecks such as Cisco control enterprise networking, giving one point of vulnerability to attack. The consumers are pressuring vendors to establish security by design as quantum threats increase and the automation of attacks accelerates. Stricter requirements may be in reaction, too, as regulators may extend the remit of CISA to critical infrastructure in the private sector.
Cybersecurity gurus are raising their voices. One of the key analysts at one of the largest threat intelligence companies says ArcaneDoor demonstrates that zero-days become campaigns. The state actors are not only breaking down the door, but redesigning it. The other specialist points to the human factor: overstretched IT departments having to balance alerts, usually not finding the time to update the firmware until it is too late.
On the upslope side, there is some opportunity. This pushes modernisation, contends a think tank policy wonk. The article titled, “Ditching end-of-life gear paves the way to secure-by-default clouds and edge computing,” states. Cisco bugs are being called out in open bounty forums, intent on crowdsourcing fixes before its enemies can use them as weapons.
With the September 26 deadline looming, cyber fortifications of the U.S. government are on the anvil. ED 25-03 is not simply a patch note, but a wakeup call to the vulnerability management process in the hyper-connected world. Victory here may stem the flow and rebuild belief in the underlying technology. Defeat may lead to a wave of attacks that may tear away society and make more ambitious adversaries.
But there is a determination in the hurry. With the help of Cisco and the vigilance of the industry, federal teams are gradually regaining ground. The scramble of today may be remembered in the annals of cyber warfare as not a downturn, but the turning point towards the immeasurable networks. Meanwhile, the catchphrase is watch: search, patch, and hope the back doors are put in place before more of the darkness gets into the house.
The world is still trying to come to terms with the consequences of the recent lockout of the global devices; however, tech giants are betting even more on an ambitious idea for the future, in which smartphones, the eyes of online life, will be related to history.
By September 21, 2025, industry giants such as Apple, Google, and Meta, as well as newcomers like Neuralink, are competing to reinvent humanity’s interaction with technology. The future, with the development of augmented reality (AR) contact lenses and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), promises seamless connectivity built into the structure of our bodies and spaces.
This transformation that has been accelerated by the recent crises of exposing the vulnerabilities of smartphones is set to transform economies, societies and even human consciousness. This is the way the tech world is transforming to the post-smartphone world.
The smartphone is a cultural powerhouse of almost twenty years, but is ageing. The recent 30/30 attempts remaining crisis, which encrypted billions of gadgets, demonstrated the weakness of the centralised, handheld systems.
Everything reached its peak with smartphones, asserted a high-level employee of one of the Silicon Valley conferences, who asked not to be identified because of ongoing investigations. The event that paralysed not only banking applications but also hospital records highlighted a serious shortcoming: the overdependence on a single gadget in identity, communication and productivity.
The market trends respond to this. The smartphone sales have been stagnant in the world, and a 2 per cent growth is projected in 2024, according to IDC analytics. Customers are demanding more than what they have received in previous years, with incremental upgrades and planned obsolescence.
In the meantime, the environmental issues regarding lithium mining and e-waste 5.3 billion discarded each year (WEEE Forum) are making regulators implement measures to reduce the device churn. The laws of the EU on the Right to Repair, as well as the mandatory carbon neutrality of the technologies in China, have already increased the pressure, forcing the companies to reconsider the handheld paradigm.
Enter the visionaries. Tech companies, which have more than half a trillion dollars in cash reserves, are betting on entirely screenless ecosystems. In an address at Google headquarters, the company’s chief innovation officer declared that the future is not a device that you keep in your pocket, but instead technology that is assimilated into your life. This is a seamless, invisible, ubiquitous mantra that is causing a tectonic shift in investment and innovation.
First of all, there is augmented reality, which will superimpose digital information onto the physical world. The Vision Pro by Apple in 2023 was an embarrassment of a first attempt, but its sequels are less crass and more daring. In a secret demonstration at Cupertino, Apple showcased prototypes of AR contact lenses, dubbed Vision Pro.
These are lenses that can display notifications and maps, and virtual assistants, and project them onto the retina, all powered by micro-LED display and graphene batteries. The first testers said that the experience felt like having the internet in your eyes, and that the controls were gesture-based, implemented into smart rings.
Meta, which cannot be left behind, is scaling up its Orion project. Plans to launch lightweight AR glasses, which will become part of its metaverse platform since it is now called Horizon Worlds 2.0, were leaked.
These glasses are not a big headset; however, as opposed to bulky ones, they look like a stylish pair of Ray-Bans, which, to some extent, combine style and functionality. Meta CEO tells investors in a 3rd-quarter earnings call that the company is transitioning off the screen to the physical world of spatial computing.
Their metaverse gamble that cost them 50 billion is being trailed as remote work and virtual tourism take off, with 300 million monthly active users projected in August 2025. In addition to consumer technology, AR is transforming industries. Surgeons in Shanghai have implemented AR visors at the Huashan hospital, where they overlay real-time MRI scans in brain operations, which reduces the time of the cutting process by 30%.
Dubai smart city designers are incorporating AR windshields into autonomous cabs, which display traffic information and cultural facts to passengers. Such uses are pointing to a new era where the digital and physical worlds are blended, and smartphone screens will no longer be necessary.
In case AR updates the way we see, brain-computer interfaces are supposed to update the way we think. Elon Musk’s FDA-approved and user-tested Neuralink: Neuralink One was featured in the news on Neuralink, a neurotech startup of Elon Musk. The coin-sized gadget, which is implanted in the skull, lets users operate the computerised world by just thinking.
Even paraplegic volunteers have streamed music, typed messages and even played chess by operating solely with neural signals. Musk tweeted that the smartphone was an intermediary; we’re bypassing it, and it would be a 15% increase in the private value of Neuralink, which reached 20 billion dollars.
Rivalry is right behind them. Blackrock Neurotech and Synchron are commercialising BCIs to be used in medical and consumer applications, and have been used in restoring speech in ALS patients and telepathic messaging.
A non-invasive headband-based BCI, named NeuroLink, was demonstrated at a technology exhibition in Tokyo, in which brainwaves can be read and sent to the game console. The demo, which proposed a gamer through a virtual samurai duel that used control-free swordplay, was viral and received 2 billion views on decentralised sites.
The consequences are overwhelming. BCIs might eliminate the need for passwords altogether, and the neural signature used for user authentication is unhackable. But there are ethical issues that cast a large shadow. Privacy activists fear brainjacking or hackers being able to intercept thoughts or even control feelings.
An Oxford 2025 study estimated that 60 per cent of consumers are worried that their data in BCI will get leaked, and the EU is preparing Neuro-Rights legislation. Tech giants are playing the role of promising quantum encryption, but confidence is weak after being locked out.
In addition to wearables and implants, the future is in ambient intelligence- environments that learn and react to the needs of human beings. The Astro 2.0, an Astro home robot with a contextual AI, is able to control the schedules, health, and even pick groceries off of the delivery drones.
The Samsung SmartThings ecosystem is an integrated smart environment in Seoul, incorporating appliances, lighting, and security into one AI-controlled platform that can be operated by voice or eye control. In January 2025, Samsung announced a $10 billion investment in IoT, with one of the company’s CEOs stating that a smartphone is the new home in their speech at CES.
The cityscape is also changing. The Smart Nation project of Singapore inserts sensors in the infrastructure of the state, and this includes the lights of the streets as well as a bench, forming an OS in the city that manages traffic patterns and the consumption of energy in real-time.
Phones are not a part of the services, as residents use biometric kiosks to access them. The satellite mesh, which today covers 95 per cent of the world, is used in rural locations of Starlink to provide high-speed internet to wearable patches so that farmers in sub-Saharan Africa can track crops with an AI-controlled skin sensor.
This change does not come without resistance. Small businesses are yet to recover following the lockdown, and ambient upgrades are unaffordable to them, which poses a danger of having a digital divide.
Mom-and-pop shops have been dependent on outdated devices in India, which have 1.2 billion smartphones in working condition, and they cannot support the new ecosystems. Governments are intervening. The Tech Inclusion Act in Brazil subsidises AR glasses to low-income families, but scaling up is difficult.
The future is full of challenges on the way to the post-smartphone world. The problem of interoperability is a nightmare; the walled garden of Apple collides with the open successors of Android offered by Google, and the cross-platform avatars in the metaverse of Meta are rejected. Post-lockout is one of the priorities that cannot be compromised.
The Aegis Shield debacle that revealed back doors in encryption protocols has caused a reckoning. An increasing pressure on companies to move to decentralised ledgers is now emerging, as identity systems based on blockchain are being piloted in Switzerland and Estonia.
Socially, there is excitement as well as dread in the transition. Gen Z, who grew up on TikTok and VR, are enthusiastic about AR and BCIs, with 70 per cent of Gen Z indicating the willingness to wear neural implants, according to a Pew Research survey.
However, older generations are still attached to smartphones, scared of intrusive technology. I want a phone that works, ” grumbled a 65-year-old retired man in a focus group in London, and this is echoed by 40 per cent of seniors around the world.
Yet the dream persists. It could be a morning in 2030: you get up, and your AR glasses display a customised warning about what you need to know that day, such as weather, email, and heart rate, and your coffee self-appears.
In the workplace, a BCI provides an idea stream straight to a collaborative virtual whiteboard. During the evening, ambient sensors turn lights off and start playing music when you enter your home, all without requiring any manual interaction with equipment. This is what tech giants are creating in the future: not a device, an extension of you.
This move out of smartphones is not a technological one but an existential one. It questions the sense of being connected, to be human. The future is brought about by the disappearance of devices, letting the experience take centre stage: a child in Nairobi studying through a holographic tutor, a Tokyo artist drawing a 3D picture, and a New York nurse saving lives thanks to holographic brain diagnostics.
The recent lockout was an eye-opener, and we realised how weak our digital foundations were. At this point, tech giants are not only rebuilding but also redefining to recover. This revolution will not be cheap and fast. It requires trillions of R&D, infrastructure and education to bridge the gap.
But the tide can never be stopped. One of the Neuralink engineers stated that we are not a place of the smartphone, but we are the replacement of the necessity of the smartphone. In a world where technology is becoming invisible, and everywhere one can find it, there is only one boundary, the desire to dream- and the possibility to protect the structures we create.
In an electronic disaster that has crippled the contemporary world, billions of smartphones, computers, and smart gadgets globally are showing an ominous sign: type in password to unlock 30/30 left to attempt.
This unique glitch, possibly a cyberattack, has brought economies to a halt as of September 21, 2025, affected emergency services, and caused panic by itself, which is unprecedented. Wall Street traders who were frozen in the middle of their trades, and families who could not use life-saving medical apps, the consequences are nothing less than apocalyptic.
Analysts are alarmed that each time they fail to log in, the clock runs out, and there is a risk of losing data forever among millions of people. It is the account of the cracking of the internet backbone, and its impact on our hyper-connected future.
The tech giants were taken by surprise when the crisis broke out immediately after midnight UTC. The first reports came out of Silicon Valley, where early morning in California, people discovered that their iPhones and Android devices were not responsive and that the usual lock screen was substituted with the dreadful prompt.
Within several hours, the phenomenon spread like an online wildfire across Europe, Asia, and the Americas. Social media sites, which at first seemed unavailable to others, were full of desperate posts by people who posted screenshots of the frozen interfaces. One of the journalists in London even tweeted that her phone is holding me hostage, and then her account went dead.
The most frightening part about this event is that it is universal. It has not only stopped at a single device, be it the newest Apple Vision Pro headset, a tough Samsung Galaxy to fit in the field, or even the systems built into a car and a home assistant.
This sensitivity of the message, 30/30 attempts remaining, is indicative of a design flaw in authentication protocols that was intentionally done, but its abrupt occurrence is indicative of something far more malevolent, a coordinated exploit of the very heart of biometric and multi-factor authentication systems.
The investigators are in a race against time to identify the source. Early investigation by cybersecurity companies such as CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks indicates that a rogue software update was forced via major operating systems at night with the intent of harming the system.
Apple, Google, and Microsoft all put out emergency statements that they are not responsible, although logs found on servers not affected show that there is at least a common theme: an emergency patch has been developed that specifically fixes quantum-resistant encryption, and that this was aimed at enhancing defences against current threats posed by AI.
The project, known as codenamed Aegis Shield, was a joint venture between the three Big Tech companies that was introduced to meet the strict requirements of the European Union Digital Resilience Act.
Nonetheless, there is an insider talk that the code was hasty, with unvetted modules by third-party vendors in Eastern Europe. In an anonymous call to the company, a member of the Google engineering team admitted that they were so preoccupied with quantum computer-proofing that they were ignoring present-day back doors.
Not all people purchase the accident story. The NSA is also being investigated in the U.S. by other intelligence agencies in connection with state-sponsored attackers. There are also whispers in Washington corridors that the opponent countries are involved in it, perhaps as retaliation against new sanctions on semiconductor shipments.
This is not a bug, it is a weapon, announced the FBI Director Elena Vasquez, in one of her infrequent public speech appearances at the headquarters of the agency in Virginia. Satellite images show irregular actions by outposts of computer server farms in remote Siberian outposts, and this has triggered speculation of a hybrid cyber-physical attack.
The timing couldn’t be worse. As world markets edge closer to the verge of a recession and tensions mount in the South China Sea, this lockout has exacerbated the existing fault lines.
New York and Tokyo Stock Exchanges closed down due to the first trading halt in more than a year since the 2022 crypto crash, as algorithms, ironically, run on the locked systems, rejected orders. Airlines suspended their fleets because they could not confirm the validity of their pilots, and hospitals reported that their surgeries were delayed due to inaccessible electronic health records.
The price paid in human life is increasing per hour. In New York City, a mother (mother Maria Gonzalez) once told local reporters that her morning nightmare outside one of the cordoned-off Apple Stores went like this: My diabetes application locked me out. I was unable to adjust the right dosage of insulin.
Had it not been an old flip phone belonging to one of the neighbours, I would not have made it to the clinic. Her stories reverberate all over the world. Traffic in Mumbai was brought to a standstill with smart lights blowing red lights, resulting in a miles-long traffic jam. The facial recognition checkpoints on Beijing subways collapsed, resulting in a scramble as well as claims of fighting.
Corporate America is ailing as well. Productivity in Fortune 500 companies such as Amazon and JPMorgan Chase has reduced by 80 per cent, with remote employees not able to access or use VPNs and cloud drives.
The Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who was on a live backup analogue line, complained, ‘We are back to pen and paper; we had a hastily called boardroom huddle.’ The supply chain implications are dismal: container ships floating off ports in Los Angeles, with frozen automated manifests, a threat of fresh produce shortage by the end of the week.
Even the safest industries are not safe. Bases in the U.S and NATO allies went to manual overrides, but not without classified briefings being interrupted. According to a Pentagon spokesperson, no national secrets were compromised, although the event highlighted a vulnerability in the Joint All-Domain Command Control system. The Gulf of Mexico oil rigs reported pump breaks in the energy industry, which in turn drove up the price of crude overnight to $120 per barrel.
The lockout has created a weird fraternal spirit socially. In suburbs all the way across Seattle to Sydney, block parties were held in neighbourhoods as people barbecued and shared anecdotes about analogue workarounds like physical keys, printed directories, and so on.
But behind the coerced nostalgia is great anxiety. Hotlines of mental health, ironically, one of the limited services that have not been axed as it has legacy landlines as a justification, have been inundated with calls from elderly clients who are frightened by the thought of permanently losing family photos and memories.
Cybersecurity luminaries are raising an alarm never before seen with exquisite urgency. Dr Lena Kim, chief researcher at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, presents a viral video essay: This is the canary in the coal mine of our over-reliance on digital locks.
It is a mental torture, 30 tries and every time you fail, you lose faith in the system. The team led by Kim has reverse-engineered the prompt and found out that it contains a self-replicating worm that is transmitted through Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, which is why it spreads so quickly.
Unsung heroes are coming up on the ground. In Berlin, hackers (organised as a collective of ethical hackers named Unlock United) have presented a jury-rigged universal bypass of this technology based on clusters of Raspberry Pi and distributed via USB sticks in libraries.
We are not breaking the law; we are repairing access,” their spokesperson, a 22-year-old prodigy named Alex Rivera, said to a mass of people. Other grassroots activities in Tokyo and Sao Paulo have reinstated partial capacity to thousands, but the problem is the difference in scale.
The testimonials of the users give a portrait of frustration and resourcefulness. Tech influencer Jordan Hale (following 5 million) wrote about his experience in a series of Polaroid pictures: Day 1: Laptop dead. Day 2: Branded passwords on my arm. Day 3: Bargaining with Siri ghosts.
The light-hearted version by Hale has been seen by millions of people on alternative platforms such as decentralised fediverse networks, which bring a ray of light into the darkness.
World leaders held a virtual G20 meeting through hastily put-together satellite connectivity. U.S. President Carla Reyes proclaimed a digital emergency on a nationwide level, mobilising the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide so-called analogue kits with notepads, maps, and wind-up radios. She promised with a vow reminiscent of the Reagan era, America will not be ransomed off by code.
In Brussels, the EU Commissioner of Digital Affairs, Thierry Laurent, said that a EUR50 billion bailout of the affected SMEs would occur, as well as a moratorium on any further software updates until independent audits clear them.
The Ministry of State Security in China was always a secretive organisation, but this time it released a statement to the effect, pointing to external vile elements and it said that 95 per cent of its features had been restored under its Great Firewall. However, reports by dissident networks are worse, as the rural villages are isolated.
The heads of tech companies were held to answer in a collective press conference broadcast out of a neutral Swiss chateau. Tim Cook of Apple, looking dishevelled, made amends often enough: we have let you down, but our teams will be working twenty-four hours a day.
Google and Microsoft also echoed the feeling, announcing a plan to roll back in phases. Phase one, currently in progress, puts the attempt counter to infinity for verified users through a temporary SMS gateway. Phase two will guarantee a forensic detective inquiry, with bounties of up to $10 million for the cause of the problem.
The regulators are like sharks around the block. The Federal Trade Commission of the U.S. initiated antitrust investigations of the Aegis Shield alliance, arguing that the market dominance inhibited stringent testing. In the UK, the Information Commissioner’s Office warned that it would impose fines of more than PS4% of worldwide revenues in case personal data is seen to be compromised.
Greenshoots of recovery are emerging even on the second day of the crisis. Iceland has become a beacon of isolated networks, powered by geothermal redundancies, they have become home to mirrored services of international aid.
Trying to implement radical remedies to the issue, quantum computing whiz kids at Oxford University suggest a move to blockchain-based authentication, with passwords becoming dynamically generated through user biometrics and environmental hashes.
To individuals, the lessons learnt are bleak. Physicalize your online existence — have a dead man’s switch journal of essential logins, buy Faraday bags to enable the isolation of devices during updates, and support open-source alternatives, which prioritise transparency.
Governments need to place mandates on single points of failure to act as finders of failures, such that failure in one place can be mitigated or transferred to the world at large. It is not a technology glitch that this lockout issues, but rather a settling of scores. It demonstrates how weak our invisible infrastructure, the strands of code that hold society together, are.
When the counters were marking off 30 to zero, one fact is that in the machine age, strength is not programmed; it is human. Through joint hard work and swift adjustments, we will be able to restart on a better footing, and when another red flag is raised, it will not be the end, but rather an isolated case in our resilient narrative.